Feedback

Wednesday 10th of November

|| **   Feedback   **  ||  **   Suggestions for improvement   **  ||  · The group published one set of minutes for one meeting.  · Everyone was present to the meeting.  · A wiki was created- This wiki was then replaced with a second wiki where the name gives a clearer indication of the group number. Negatives:  · Even though a wiki was created (IC708) on the 3rd of November only 2 members joined it and no one significantly contributed to it (e.g. creating individual pages, uploading material etc..)  · Minutes for first meeting were poor, more info are needed. It is unclear who is researching which part of the case study  · No material has been published anywhere PD – Agreed with above  ||  Members should all join the wiki and contribute to discussion. Each Member should create his/her own page on the wiki where to upload papers as well as drafts. Each member should work on the layout of his/her page as this will allow and show improvement in IT skills. Part of the final mark for the case study will be on presentation, this will include how nicely laid out the wiki is, and how ‘reader-friendly’ it is. Make sure you work on the layout as this will also show improvement on your IT skills. Please make sure you work on individual topics as you would work on an essay. Use references throughout and refer to peer reviewed papers Upload minutes for each meeting in the wiki. ||
 * **  Group number   **
 * ** 2  **  ||  Positives: